Let’s get right into it since Elon Musk’s X throttled this critical thread. I need to elaborate further to show you what the native peasantry of Europe and North America have to deal with daily.

#5 Indians.

The most timid race and least likely to commit savage violent acts. Indians are the weakest race on the list according to statistics. The average Indian height is 164 cm, with an IQ of 75, if not lower. But don’t be fooled by their physical inferiority. Indians are similar to Jews when it comes to thievery, lying, and arrogance. Indians are largely Hindus which means worshipping 330 million demons. Listening to a pantheon of ‘‘gods’’ is a recipe for psychological disaster. Their rational faculties are shut down by the satanic nature of Hindu culture. The Hindu caste system contributes to the Dunning-Kruger effect so many Indians suffer from, especially the higher castes that can afford to invade the West.

Indians migrate to superior Western nations through different means compared to Muslims and Sub-Saharans. Green cards and visas ensure the cancerous multiplicity of the Indian species within the West which is why you so many of them hounding after managerial positions that enable them to hire mediocre or downright incompetent fellow demon worshippers. Their high in-group bias and unhygienic cultic practices that involve animal urine and feces are incompatible with Western standards.

#4 Sub-Saharans

Hands down the lowest IQ on the list. Luckily, the least capable race of infiltration and subversion. Fresh-off-the-boat Sub-Saharans are extremely volatile due to the underdeveloped environment of Africa, functional retardation, and lust for carnal nonsense. Matters only get worse when the Sub-Saharan is a Muslim. Sub-Saharans are keen on owning useless consumerist items such as luxury cars or sneakers while neglecting their homeland’s infrastructure. The self-destructive nature of this species is dangerous to European countries because the latter builds for the future, unlike the black invaders.

Sub-Saharan Muslims are even worse. Take all of their bad traits but on steroids thanks to the anti-Christian teachings of Islam. You will find no demographic viler than this one because Islam instills a Talmudic-inspired arrogance in the low IQ Sub-Saharan. This race is most useful in causing direct chaos in small European towns. They are the Jew’s stormtroopers.

#3 Somalis.

Technically Sub-Saharans but virtually all of them are Muslim. I already touched on this demographic earlier although I feel it’s important to single out the Somalis since so many infest both the USA and Europe. And not to mention how irritating these people are in the way they carry themselves in public. Their women are obese and ugly, their children are misbehaving and their men lust after native European women. Next to being ugly and low-IQ, they are always on welfare. Somalis are experts in abusing the welfare state. Their numbers are infinite and always a good source of bioweapons to flood peaceful societies with.

#2 Turks.

The highest IQ of them all coming in with 85 points on average. Turks are a mixed bag of races and cultures but alas Europeans get the lowest scum from the Turkish mainland. Turkish migrants are smarter Muslims which is why they get involved in Western politics. Adept at subversion and feigned friendliness as your local kebab shop owner. Turks are potentially the most dangerous on the list since they adopt Jewish infiltration tactics that influence the policies of the Netherlands, for example.

And like the aforementioned demographics, Turks are prone to violence and rape. They are also no stranger to drug trafficking on a massive scale. Combine that with delusional Turkish nationalism while leeching off European benefits. Turks give other bioweapons a run for their money in terms of being insufferable.

#1 Muslims (Arabs, Pakistanis, Afghans).

The average Muslim IQ is between 70 and 90 if we exclude Sub-Saharans. These creatures are incredibly dangerous because they are the apex Jewish bioweapons. Funding from Saudi Arabia enables the construction of mosques (breeding grounds for Islamic terrorists) throughout Europe, especially the UK which is the result of British and Saudi collusion against the interest of average UK citizens. Jewish, Vatican and liberal NGOs solve the logistical problems of importing these anti-Christian savages. Pakistani Muslims are specialized in pedo grooming gangs. Afghans rape animals and children. Arabs do a bit of both and terrorize Europeans with knives, guns, and running trucks through crowded areas.

Islam is first and foremost a political cult intent on conquering non-Muslims. The Quran and Sunnah explicitly state anti-Christian conduct. E.g. how to fight, enslave, and forcefully convert them.

"I have been ordered to fight with the people till they say, none has the right to be worshipped but Allah." - Sahih Al Bukhari vol 4:196.

What is the best deed for the Muslim next to believing in Allah and His Apostle?  His answer was: " To participate in Jihad in Allah’s cause. " - Sahih Al Bukhari vol 1:25.

 "Strike terror (into the hearts of) the enemies of God and your enemies." - Surah 8:60.

 Fight (kill) them (non-Muslims), and God will punish, (torment) them by your hands, cover them with shame." - Surah 9:14.

Muslims come with a prepackaged anti-Christian sentiment which is profitable to the Jews who desire nothing but the destruction of Christian culture. The Jews and Muslims explicitly deny Christian dogma. Muslims are therefore the perfect Jewish proxy warriors in realizing the Talmudic multicultural hellhole on European and American soil.

Imagine two clear sides fighting each other in WW1-styled trenches. That’s a rare form of warfare now. The classic way of nations battling it out is nearly extinct. Bankers and NGOs using cultural means to destroy their enemies is the most actual way of warfare now. Western, white, Christian people must be eradicated according to Jewish-controlled institutions because this demographic poses the greatest threat to global Talmudic hegemony. Especially high-IQ orthodox Christians are a target because they understand the theology and history behind Talmudic hostility.

Indian and Sub-Saharan antics.

Jews cannot use Bolshevik means i.e. mass genocide through violence anymore. Their ultimate weapon is the negroid, Hindu, and Islamic horde. What these demographics have in common is a satanic-influenced envy of the West. Brown cultures are objectively uglier than European heritage nations in every aspect: architecture, behavior, biology, literature, etc. Instead of admiring this obvious superiority, the Jewish bioweapon hates what is beautiful. Not to mention, Islam is inherently anti-Christian. Negroids, Indians, and Muslims are intellectually inferior to Europeans because the former groups have normalized inbreeding. The Indian caste system and the Indian’s habit of worshipping 330 million demons caused the Indians to produce a psychological illness, Dunning-Kruger. An Indian is the most deluded out of all Jewish bioweapons because their self-perceived superiority is debunked by the fact that Indian IQ hovers around 75 IQ and are the least desired mating partners according to anecdotes and interracial marriage statistics. Next to that, Indians have an extremely high ingroup bias to the point where they self-implode. E.g. an HR department invaded by Indians discriminates against all candidates who are not Indian. Thus, shooting themselves in the foot by rejecting meritocracy which is the key to a successful business. The Indians infect the workplace with their mediocrity or downright incompetence. Not only that, their pagan and unhygienic habits literally infect Westerners because feces play a holy role in Hinduism.

Sub-Saharans possess the lowest IQ of all the other Jewish bioweapons and produce near-infinite numbers which is a great combination to be an effective cultural disrupter. The negroid possesses a higher degree of hypersensitivity than its Muslim and Indian peers but they’re less effective in sophisticated operations such as infiltrating Western politics. In general, savage blacks are best used to cause riots and strain the welfare system of European nations. There is never a shortage of Sub-Saharans to flood the idyllic European countryside.

The Muslim scourge.

The top 3 worst migrants are without a doubt, sub-saharans, Muslims, and Indians but Muslims are by far the worst and most effective. The cult of Muhammad is quite adept at subverting Christians because they share a common enemy; the Jews. History and contemporary times prove that Muslims de facto ally themselves with Jews to destroy Christians. Through deceitful tactics such as Muslim rhetoric: ‘‘we love Jesus too!’’ makes the Muhammadans on this point alone more effective bioweapons than Indians or sub-saharans. Initially, Muslims try to befriend Christians and white people by lying about their supposed commonalities.

Here are a few examples Muslims tirelessly repeat to appease Christians and right-wingers:

• We hate LGBT

• We value tradition

• Israel attacks us therefore we’re allies.

• We’re an Abrahamic faith

• We love Jesus, Mary, and Moses

Sheltered Europeans and ignorant sub-urban dwelling Americans swallow these Islamic lies without question. Now you can see how effective Muslims are as Jewish bioweapons because they’re like mini-Jews when it comes down to subversion. Neither the Indian nor sub-saharan can utilize such deception because Muslims have slightly higher IQs and Islam does have a few similarities with Christianity albeit far-fetched.

Chinese (foreign) ‘‘investors’’

A less touched-on subject is the fact that East Asians, especially Chinese, ruin the housing market in particular areas of the West. Chinese do not engage in erratic violence like the Muslims. Chinese take up physical space by investing in huge properties that belong to American and European citizens. Vancouver is a prime example of Chinese invaders pouring capital into the real estate market. The Chinese drive up housing prices and many of these properties are underused or empty. Jewish organizations like BlackRock engage in the same practices.

Wealthy foreign investors and savage brown people synergize perfectly to destroy the harmony of Western nations. The former makes you a slave while the latter keeps you busy with direct attacks. HIAS is one the most well-known Jewish NGOs to facilitate the Islamic and Indian invasion through migration. The World Jewish Relief also proves that Jews have a major hand in sponsoring bioweapons to strain the cultural fabric of Europe.

Mass migration poses the greatest threat to European and American civilization because Jewish bioweapons are carefully selected as part of the Kalergi plan where Jews rule over a disjointed, identityless, and chaotic Western world. Importing violent low-IQ savages is the fastest way to eradicate a homogenous culture. They are parasites by leeching the welfare system. They murder and rape the natives. They do the Jew’s bidding because of their shared hatred of the beautiful Christian heritage nations.

Subscribe now

A good tree cannot bear bad fruit, nor can a bad tree bear good fruit. Every tree that does not bear good fruit is cut down and thrown into the fire. Therefore by their fruits you will know them. - Matthew 7:18-20

This Bible verse is important to discern Jewish conduct. They say we have to respect all religions despite how wicked foreign cultures are. ‘‘It’'s dey culture’’. Normies love to discuss politics, and how bad the war in Israel is, and give their uninformed opinions about geopolitical matters. However, when you are actually informed and go a little deeper to find out the root cause of ‘political issues’, and consequently say that the Israeli/Hamas war is borne out of Jewish conduct, you’re an antisemite.

Normal goyim think ‘‘Judaism’’ is just a religion like any other. This is false. Rabbinic Judaism i.e. Talmudism i.e. Zionism is the operating system of a Jew. War, politics, culture, and morality are all downstream from their theology.

Pornography.

Hardcore pornography is intentionally subversive as admitted by Al Goldstein who invented the genre. Porn hijacks men’s natural inclination to mate with a suitable woman. It derails rational thought by allowing access to a near-infinite amount of women, consequently paralyzing the consumer. Neutralizing men, who are otherwise dangerous, is profitable for politicians and corporate oligarchs. Men, except for Christian monastics should have real and frequent sex to quench their sexual passions which are often preyed upon for nefarious ends.

There is no greater, cheaper, and effective force than sexual subversion. The Jews and spiritually Jewish Goyim are fully aware of this by weaponizing it in the most obvious way when Israelis broadcasted pornography to the Palestinians in 2002 Ramallah. This form of pornographic attack is archaic by now. Even PornHub, owned by a rabbi, is starting to crumble due to governmental pressure and public scrutiny. Their attacks are becoming too obvious now. People crave intimacy more than ‘‘blowing off steam’’ visiting PornHub which is why OnlyFans and AI girlfriends are wildly popular now, both pioneered by Jews like Sam Altman and Leonid Radvinsky.

The mainstream conception of Judaism is akin to Christian piety. Rabbis are seen as holy, exemplary figures so it would be a shocker to find out for ‘normal’ people to notice that rabbis own PornHub and sell buttplugs online, referring to rabbi Shmuley on X. Take Christian moral teachings and then reverse all of it, now you understand what Modern Judaism is about.

Unlimited evil.

Knowing your limits is a sign of rational thinking. Jews are anti-Logos which is why they are incapable of setting limits. Take the Gaza genocide for example; a ‘‘counter reaction’’ to Hamas who murdered Jews on October 7th, 2023. It’s indisputable that some Jews and goyim died during an operation Israel allowed to happen. However, even normies cannot deny the footage of Israeli airstrikes saturating the Gaza Strip or IDF soldiers jokingly blowing up major apartment blocks. The Jewish mind has such a blood lust that it cannot think and sit for a moment what kind of reaction they are provoking around the world.

Every single person did and does evil things to some extent. Practicing Christians are the most aware of sinful behavior as opposed to every single other group which makes them more conscious of setting limits. For example, Russia ‘‘invaded’’ Ukraine in a relatively mild manner because the Russians know that restraint limits casualties and further escalation. Jews behave oppositely as demonstrated in Gaza.

Psychology, Dark Triad.

The Jew Freud pioneered the way we look at psychology. Although the field in itself is neutral, human psychology is a real thing and should be studied to understand the mind in a better way. Today, it’s used for manipulation, Machiavellianism, and self-interest. Freud used it to justify incest which of course influenced future psychologists to justify other sexual degenerate activities.

Have you ever noticed that the same ‘psychology’ books are pushed in bookstores or self-improvement communities?

• 48 Laws of Power

• How to Win Friends and Influence People

• Sapiens: A Brief History of Humankind

• The Art of Seduction

• Think and Grow Rich

• Man’s Search for Meaning

• The Prince

• Thinking, Fast and Slow

• Predictably Irrational

Only The Prince was not written by a Jew or cultist. To be fair, Niccolo Machiavelli simply documented how the aristocracy played their power games in his day. Furthermore, he wanted to gain the favor of the Medicis by giving the book as a kind of manual, not to teach goyim how to behave like Jews. Wholly, it was never meant for ‘lay people’ to be read and contemplated. The other books are supposed to reach millions if not billions.

An example of Dark Triad (Jew) behavior is how contemporary liberals, politicians, pundits, and college students act like victims. This is to lower your guard so that physically inferior people can manipulate you. Can you guess what certain minority in the history of mankind operates this way? Exactly.

Now there is wisdom in every book (maybe not Sapiens) so they’re worth a read to get a sense of what normie pseudo-intellectuals are revering. Other than that, it’s a waste of time and resources.

Conclusion.

The last three points are in my humble opinion the most relevant and evergreen results of Jewish culture. Sex, psychology, and irrationality are the main overarching themes to subvert a nation. Usury, transgenderism, feminism, etc are downstream from any of the points mentioned earlier.

Dark Triad personality and sexual liberation are currently the favorite poisons of the goyim because they give a sense of power. The feeling of superiority without merit is no doubt very tempting.

Subscribe now

This is not a Bible VS Quran post. Rather we are going to look into the reasons why these books exist in the first place. It’s a much more digestive and simple way of understanding Islam and Christianity instead of going back and forth with verses from each book.

Muslims and Christians have different presuppositions of their scripture. It’s the reason why Muslims often, if not always miss the point of why the Bible exists in the first place. They hold the Quran as al-furqan which means it is the ultimate criterion to judge between good and evil or between truth and falsity. So it does not matter to the Muslims whether scientific or Biblical scripture contradicts the Quran. A Muslim is forced to refer to the Quran in every matter. Christians do not hold this view on the Bible nor did the Jews of the Old Testament. They never believed that ultimate authority could or would be contained by a book. Limiting God to ink on paper or information transmitted through oral means is and has never been the way of Abraham, Moses, or Jesus. The Holy Spirit works at this very moment and has been doing that for the last 2000 years and before that, unlike Allah who passed down a book to one man that serves as a complete tutorial.

The Quran came down as a ready-to-go instruction book that came gradually over the years of Muhammad’s life. His revelations ended with his death so he was the sole and last receiver of God’s messages. Surah 11:1 explains how the Arabic book is perfectly clear and explains everything. The greatest miracle of Islam is that the Quran is preserved. Not a dot or a comma has been changed even though Muhammad was illiterate. This is the cornerstone of Islam.

How the Bible came to be, and what its purpose is, is different from the Quran. Firstly, it’s a collection of books written by men who were divinely inspired, guided by the Holy Spirit. Christians and Old Testament Jews do not claim that the scriptures are the final or sole authority on every matter. The Old Testament is a prophecy of the New Testament and served as a guide to the flock of Moses. Wholly, the Bible serves as a guide to salvation but is not a super necessary thing to be saved. It’s not the reason why Christians believe in Christianity but explains what they believe; the life, death, resurrection, transfiguration, and ascension of Jesus Christ who made it possible for humankind to be saved from hell, and redeem all creation.

The Bible is not an explanation of literally everything. It’s not a science journal or a rigorous life tutorial. Its miraculous preservation and divinely inspired texts are great reasons to believe in it but not as important as Christ’s sacrifice. It’s a total 180 compared to the Quran. The content of the Islamic book is confusing, incoherent, and unintelligible even according to Muslims, especially Sunnis without the Sunnah i.e. the recorded events of Muhammad’s life. However, the actual texts are not as remarkable for Muslims compared to its preservation (or poetic beauty). The proof of that statement can be found in the prayer life of Muslims. Recitation is done in Arabic, also by non-Arabic speaking Muslims so most of the time they do not fully understand what they are saying. Muslims are not concerned about the actual texts, unlike Christians.

The ironic thing about the Quran is that Muslims still have not decided what the Quran canonically is, while the Bible was canonized by councils led by the Holy Spirit. All the churches and bishops (except heretics) agreed on the canon. The texts of the Bible were never disputed until the Reformation which had no ground or authority to remove books from the Bible, but I digress. The point is, that biblical scripture was ‘standardized’ very early on in Christianity while the Quran is still disputed. But we could say that the Muslims finally standardized their texts in 1924 in Egypt or when Uthman arbitrarily burned manuscripts of the Quran after Muhammad’s untimely death. The 31+ variations of the Quran prove that Muslims still do not have an ultimate canon of their holy book. Muslims cope by saying that the differences are merely dialectical, but that is false. At a glance, the texts seem similar, but further inspection exposes devastating differences in the meaning.

Islam’s primary marketing strategy is the preservation of the Quran. Again, allegedly not a dot or comma has been changed. Just merely two examples annihilate these claims. Why should anyone believe in Islam if the main bait is simply not true?

I did not intend to debunk the preservation of the Quran but to show you these major errors are important. It destroys the reason why Muslims believe in Islam. Christians do not have this problem because they never claim whatever the Muslims claim. Furthermore, it cannot be overlooked how hypocritical the Muslims are on this issue. The Bible has many different translations originating from the same Hebrew and Greek texts. This is a reason for Muslims to reject Christianity, and it is wrong for two reasons; one, Muslims cannot apply the same criterion for Christians regarding the Bible, and second, different translations do not prove corruption of the texts.

Muslims (intentionally) misunderstand why Christians believe. Attacking straw men is what they do to affirm their lies, even top Islamic sheiks apply these tactics to remain relevant in academia. Muslims attack a ‘‘Christianity’’ they fabricated. Islam is a book religion while Christianity is historical. Muslims fail to understand that or are willfully ignorant.

Subscribe now

Religions are not all equal. Some cultures are superior to others. It doesn’t get any more racist and xenophobic to state these objective facts in 2024. But it is necessary to call out nonsense religions because what you believe dictates your behavior. And we can all agree that there are good and bad ways of conduct. Every single human is religious despite what secularists like to say smugly, atheism is just the absence of theism, yet they cannot help themselves but impose their way of life on others.

The following five religions are ordered based on history, theology, epistemology, and last, the fruits. With that said, let’s get into the top 5 lowest IQ religions of human history.

#5 Islam

Founded in 7th century Arabia, Medina by Muhammad claims to be the true continuation of Abraham’s religion. Its strongest claims are personal divine revelations from God to Archangel Gabriel and finally to Muhammad which are miraculously preserved in the Quran. The reason for God to ‘reset’ Abraham’s religion is due to the corrupted texts of the Torah and Gospel. Islam’s Allah was not able to preserve the truth for 600 years after Christ.

Muslims claim to be monotheists and believe in the prophets of the Old Testament. Quite a bold claim but it is one of the few, if not the only other religion than Christianity to say that. So let’s dissect their claim of monotheism first. Allah is truly one, there is nothing like him in creation. He is fully transcendent and unchanged. It sounds good on paper, but this poses serious problems. First, Allah is a loving God according to Muslims. Love is a deep affection for someone. Allah existed before creation, and he is one person, so who exactly did love if he was eternally lonesome? Allah had to change if he could love, but that would not make him a god. Trinitarians do not have this problem because the three persons of the Christian godhead loved each other for eternity. They did not need creation for attributes to be ascribed to them.

Secondly, the Quran is the word of Allah and divine, yet it is a creation. It is separate from Allah. The essence of the Quran is different and it is also eternal. This is the definition of polytheism. Christians believe the Trinity is one essence, three persons. Muslims do not make this distinction so they believe in two gods. Not to mention, the spirit of Allah which is also separate from Allah. Again, there is no essence/person distinction. Muslims worship three gods according to their theology and philosophy.

The fact that this goes over their heads is proof that Islam is a low-IQ religion. Besides, Muslims made a culture out of not questioning theological topics because ‘how’ it came to be is answered by saying: bila kayf, It’s just how it is. Debating and philosophical culture is very new to Muslims because the Islamic world lived relatively isolated from Western influences.

#4 Deism

Deists believe in a god that created everything but is uninvolved with human affairs. Or creation at all. Deism is the result of taking human reason to its extremes which is how rationalist Christians usually end up deistic, consequently agnostic or atheist. Rationality becomes de facto god. Deism denies holy scripture and its revelations, next to rejecting the historical evidence for Christ’s miracles. In many ways, deism is atheistic except for the fact that a god had to set creation into motion. They do believe a transcendent existed before the Big Bang to create ex nihilo (out of nothing).

But to make deism work, you must throw out historical science and fulfilled prophecies of the Bible. If you do that, then we cannot know anything about history, we cannot be certain if Caesar, Charlemagne, or Napoleon existed. A deistic god could technically be the standard for morality but chooses not to because he did not provide revelations such as scripture, personal intervention, Ten Commandments, etc. Morality thus comes from human reason or observance of nature which are both bad ‘standards’ because neither is eternal. Animals rape and slaughter other animals. In 2024, human ‘reason’ resulted in pregnant men and transgender children. Deism is a dead end. It is a little dumber than Islam because it has a worse account of morality.

#3 Neopaganism

Paganism is not ancient. The contemporary understanding of paganism has its roots in modern occultists and Satanists such as Aleistar Crowley who invented Wicca. It’s hard to specifically pinpoint who or what caused the dawn of neopaganism. But you have to see it as a gradual twisting of historical paganism which ironically Christian monks preserved. Neopaganism in 2024 is largely a Hollywood fantasy. Most of its adherents are overweight consumers who are easily drawn by pretty aesthetics such as Viking tattoos, runes, and depictions of Odin. The 1950s-70s New Age gave birth to ‘Nordic paganism’, imported from India. Yogi gurus pioneered pagan alternatives to lukewarm, or otherwise undiscerning, Protestants and Catholics by presenting yoga or transcendental meditation as compatible with Christianity. From there on, New Agers invented various forms of paganism.

Neopaganism is easily refuted if we look at its moral and metaphysical claims. Just as we did with Islam, we are going to dissect what the pagan community largely claims. First, might is right. Those with strength and wealth have the ultimate say and thus hold the truth. Or just look at nature, and do what feels natural, which is a fallacy, but we will get back to the strength claim. Second, the pantheon of the gods. Let’s just take the Viking myths for brevity’s sake.

Norse theology begins with a void that separates a land of fire and the other of ice. These lands came in contact and consequently created giants who begot children. One of them is known as Odin, the main god. So it seems creation is eternal according to Norse paganism. Where did the lands of fire and ice come from? How did the void get there? The creation story is basically: shit happened. Also, it goes against the evidence of the Big Bang. Even atheists agree with theists that time, space, and creation came into being. The universe is not eternal. Besides, Odin cannot act as the supreme moral arbiter because he was born at some point (different from Christ’s eternal begetting of the Father), but pagans do not believe that Odin is a moral standard. That opens another can of worms. Morality in paganism is thus relative so they have no ground to stand on when debating morals. Islam, for example, does not have this problem.

‘‘Might makes right’’. By this logic, we should not question Elon Musk, Larry Fink, or Bill Gates’ morality. Nor any powerful institution. No matter how vile or corrupt they are.

Granted, neopagans are a little smarter than Hindus because most of the former are ex-Protestants frustrated with weak Christians. They retain much of Christian morals and culture without being aware of it. None of them are openly sacrificing humans or raiding seaside villages of East-England. ‘White pagans’ inherited Christian culture which is why they ‘‘naturally’’ reject the immorality of ancient pagans. And in general, are more pleasant to deal with than Hindus.

2# Hinduism

The mother religion of the New Age. But instead of a few dozen gods, Hindus worship millions and even live animals such as cows and rats. Again like neopaganism, Hindus do not have an absolute moral arbiter like the Trinitarian God.

Hinduism does not have a canonical explanation of creation, unlike the Christians. Different Hindu sects believe in different stories, but it all boils down to a creation myth I wrote about the Norse. However, it’s fair to assume that the most popular belief is about the god Brahma who created the universe. Time isn’t linear in Hinduism. Universes are eternally created and destroyed together with Brahma’s coworker gods Shiva and Vishnu. It logically follows that death and evil are not inherently bad because Hindus do not teach the doctrine of the fall. Besides, these gods are omnipotent and all came into being at one point except for Vishnu. Gods cannot eternally create and destroy if they were created nor does it make sense for multiple beings to possess omnipotence without the distinction of essence and person.

It’s impossible to know good and evil if multiple gods share the same powers. Vishnu, the uncreated god struggles with the same problems as Allah regarding his attributes. Hinduism does not try to be coherent and so incoherence spills over into the morals and behavior of Hindus which is why they are notorious for polluting the environment with feces. And rape. And Dunning-Kruger.

#1 Atheism

The fool hath said in his heart, There is no God. - Psalm 14:1

I mean, where do I even start? Atheists completely discard metaphysics to make their worldview and paradigm work. Not to mention, give an account for morality, which is impossible if you are strictly a materialist. Atheism thus regresses into sense data to judge whether something is good or bad. Don’t they know that masochists exist? And pedophiles who derive pleasure from molesting small children? It feels good to them, so who is an atheist to say that a pedophile cannot do as he pleases?

The atheist who does believe in metaphysics cannot objectively give an account for morals. There is no transcendent arbiter to be the standard for good conduct in atheism which is why atheists automatically fall into relativism. Thus any moral claim is merely an opinion that is utterly useless in the real world.

How many times have you heard that atheism liberates you from religious constraints because there is no ‘‘mean sky-daddy’’ judging you BUT don’t you dare be a racist? Ultimately, atheist morality is decided by those in charge, not what is objectively true. Godless doctrines hinge on the tyranny of the many and powerful.

This is how atheism is dead in its tracks. We can go on 24/7 refuting Darwinism, morals, or creation if we do not address the atheist’s epistemology first. Like the pagans, they will go on a rant about how monkeys turned into humans without empirical evidence. The theory of evolution is a subset of Hindu mythology which is how pagan and atheist rhetoric sounds so similar. Engaging in any of that is a waste of time because they are unable to give an epistemological account for their claims.

He who denies the existence of God, has some reason for wishing that God did not exist. - St. Augustine

Subscribe now

Culture and politics are downstream from theology.

Please, do not confuse this with God-given immortality through Christ. I am talking about the science fiction type. The cyberpunk genre and modern technology instilled a false hope in atheists for a chance of immortality. Global elites such as Bill Gates and Jeff Bezos unironically believe eternal life is possible with the progress of machines.

Many theories have been proposed and explored to achieve this. Theories like uploading your consciousness to a network or a ‘farmed’ physical body that can be genetically designed to the customer's wishes. Maybe a special chip that allows you to live forever as long as nothing physically life-threatening happens to you.

A pseudo-immortal means is already possible. Uploading one’s personality into a computer is then constructed as an algorithm to mimic the deceased person flawlessly. The technology is not perfect, but it is realistic to imagine with the unnaturally quick development of artificial intelligence. Picture a Siri-like computer solely to represent the personality of a dead person. That is already possible. This is but a warm-up for the masses to be comfortable with the idea that no one could really ‘‘die’’.

This method of ‘‘immortality’’ is for the goyim’s mass consumption needs. It’s funny how atheists fall for this because materialists do not believe in, or cannot believe in ‘consciousness’ being uploaded into a database because there is no way to observe the soul or mind. Yet, the idea of living forever gives poor and rich atheists hope. Immortality is the main driver for any person. Be it through memory, legacy, children, technology, or God. This is what all people have in common.

Muslims are motivated by 72 virgins in Jannah. Hindus desire to be reincarnated as something better. Atheists want to ‘chip’ their way into immortality. Christians (who are correct) believe in Christ’s promise of eternal life when everything is made new. All people act as if there is something beyond this life. Even hardcore atheists who believe there is nothing when you die. The fact they’re trying to convince others of their worldview proves that they care enough to persuade people so that mankind conducts its ways according to their standards. Acting as if nothing matters supposedly liberates us from religious constraints. They care enough for the progress of mankind, even in death. How is that not a form of immortal desire?

There is simply no escaping the search for eternity.

“My endeavor is to basically figure out how to not die,” Bryan Johnson

Bryan Johnson correctly said that he is playing the same game everyone else is playing: not dying. He is correct on many things regarding health. Check your blood work, have a steady sleep schedule, eat high-quality food, and use technology to advance human health. These are good things. Johnson’s net worth is around $400 million and he is an atheist. It is a classic recipe to develop a god-complex. What Bryan does not understand, is ignorant of, or simply rejects is the fall of Adam. No matter how optimized or rich you are, you cannot escape death. Mankind defected beyond ‘repair’ through human means. One day the world will end according to Christian eschatology. Atheists scoff at these supposed fairy tales while ironically insisting the world will be destroyed through climate change, meteorite strikes, nuclear warfare, or colliding with the Andromeda Galaxy. So what is the point of immortality exactly when we’re all going to die anyway? Simple. Pure foolishness.

The fool says in his heart, "There is no God’’ - Psalm 14:1

Bezos, Johnson, and Gates are all smarter than you and me, yet they are foolish enough to not see how their philosophies and ambitions for immortality are in vain. It’s all for naught, even from a secular perspective for the reasons I mentioned earlier. But let’s pretend an apocalyptic event will never happen, imagine having to live forever in fear of fatal accidents or murder. Ok, now pretend their body is impervious, like a Terminator robot, you’ll still have to deal with the defects of human nature. These defects extend to animals, plants, and even the entire universe. Lucifer’s fall was of cosmic proportion. Adam’s sin caused death to enter reality. Billionaire vampires would have to deal with a broken world for an eternity which is a hell on its own. Being an invincible, immortal Dracula-like human is a loss, no matter how you look at it.

To clarify, our world is not evil or hell. The future of mankind is not destined to exist in the universe's current state. Men who crave immortality in this world create their own kind of hell. Imagine being ‘‘deathless’’ but still having to deal with anger, envy, paranoia, hatred, uncertainty, arrogance, greed, injustice, vengeance, laziness, boredom, adultery, rape, complaints, impatience, hypocrisy, gossip, theft, and I can go on and on. Vampire inquirers do not think this through. Or they must love the miseries this world offers. The latter is more likely the case for billionaires, not because they acquired an inexhaustible amount of wealth, but their obsession with control. Billions in cash is not evil. A toxic passion for building a worldly kingdom is. The quest for immortality is a desire to become like God which can only end in the way Prometheus is familiar with.

The average goyim will not attain cyberpunk-esque immortality. Magic pills to slow down aging are not going to be for everyone. You are going to work in Amazon spaceships that ship packages back to Earth where the immortal elite will live until the end of times. Yeah, I am not making that up. Jeff Bezos said that a year ago. He wants to house a trillion people one day, but the problem is that the surface of our planet is insufficient. Huge cylindrical spaceships that float in, well you know, space are the solution to overpopulation. You will live in the mega cylinder spaceship, goy!

"I would love to see a trillion humans living in the solar system… The only way to get to that vision is with giant space stations… The planetary surfaces are just way too small." - Jeff Bezos in an interview with Lex Fridman

Scaring the public with climate change, and apocalyptic visions of the Earth’s polluted destiny are small steps to convince consumers how cool off-world living is going to be. Literally like the movie Blade Runner, bro! Behind closed doors, Bezos and co plan to turn Earth into a pseudo-Garden of Eden where death does not exist (among the elite) and a tropical holiday is celebrated 24/7. If you’re one of the lucky goyim, you can book a trip to Earth as a way to escape hell in space, I mean, your living quarters.

Just take a shuttle and visit Earth…

"Same way that you might go to Yellowstone National Park" - Jeff Bezos in an interview with Lex Fridman

Immortality and space exploration are the idols of atheism. Bezos’ vision is a ‘‘theology’’ shared by elite colleagues and the average goy who doesn’t go to church. Ultimately, it is what drives them. Bezos stepped down from Amazon’s CEO position to focus on Blue Origin, which is going to facilitate his tropical Dracula lifestyle due to ‘‘some sense of urgency”. I am reminded of the atheist’s creed: One day science will fix death. One day science will demystify the universe. One day science will make philosophy obsolete. They cope by appealing to the mystery of science which atheists accuse theists of all the time but with God. This is your brain on the quest for immortality.

Subscribe now

Maybe you've heard of the mysterious assassins. Possibly from Hollywood movies and popular video game series. Where they're portrayed as a cool secretive order fighting the evil Templar.

But forget what you've seen and heard. The reality is far more interesting and relevant to our times. I'll tell you why. There are a few sources on the topic. Many stories are legends. But based on the account of Marco Polo and the Quran's description of Paradise can we understand what was going on in the order of assassins. Jihadi warriors have been ruthless and fearless in their territorial expansion. This can be attributed to the command of Allah to subdue infidels with violence or conversion. And the promise of Jannah. Islamic heaven where 72 virgins await them for an eternal orgy. Women with big eyes and pear-shaped breasts. Rarely would a Muslim deny that opportunity.

Grooming the would-be assassin.

Now, the assassin's leader took this to a whole other level. He'd drug would-be assassins into a euphoric state to do his bidding. But first, let me tell you a quick background story of the fearsome Shiite Muslim assassins. The real assassin's creed was a sect that split off from the Shiites. One of the two main sects of Islam. The assassins were called the Nizari Ismailites. The Ismaili people still exist with around 15 million Muslims today. The Nizaris fled to Persia because their prince was executed in Egypt. The leader, Hassan-i-Sabbah settled his small tribe in the mountains of Syria and Persia. They were surrounded by enemies, and so they created impregnable strongholds.

A successor of Hassan, known as the Old Man of the Mountain recreated the Islamic version of Paradise in one of these strongholds. He drugged young men with hashish as a part of the assassin recruitment. They'd wake up in ''Paradise'' where the Old Man erected elegant pavilions where milk and honey flowed through the runnels. Beautiful women played instruments. They were somewhere between 12 and 20 years old. But only the boys who wished to be assassins could enter that place and 'play' with the women.

Anyone else was forbidden to behold the beauty of this paradise. Only a small part of the Ismailite sect was part of the fedayeen (assassins). Usually, the boys who'd be groomed by the Old Man were 6 to 10 years old. The assassin leader knew exactly what he was doing. Grooming boys at such young ages would make them vicious assassins, willing to do his bidding and kill whoever needed to be killed. Even if escape was impossible and death was inevitable.

The Old Man recreated Muhammad's paradise exactly as described in the Quran 37:38-49:

You will certainly taste the painful torment, and will only be rewarded for what you used to do. But not the chosen servants of Allah. They will have a known provision: fruits of every type. And they will be honored in the Gardens of Bliss, facing each other on thrones. A drink of pure wine will be passed around to them from a flowing stream: crystal-white, delicious to drink. It will neither harm them nor will they be intoxicated by it. And with them will be maidens of modest gaze and gorgeous eyes, as if they were pristine pearls.

The promise of 72 houris (heavenly virgins) was nothing new in Islam. It's a pillar teaching in the Quran. One of the great motivators of jihadis and any Muslim who takes his religion seriously lusts for those women with swelling breasts.

The horny assassin would have no impotence in heaven!

Each time we sleep with a Houri we find her virgin. Besides, the penis of the Elected never softens. The erection is eternal. - Al-Suyuti, Al-Itqan fi Ulum al-Qur'an, p. 351

Contemporary Westerners think that the assassins fought with such zeal because of the hashish which is far from the truth. Yes, they were exceptionally trained murderers, but their core inspiration was their undying devotion to the Old Man and his promise of Paradise as described in the Quran (9:111):

Allah has indeed purchased from the believers their lives and wealth in exchange for Paradise. They fight in the cause of Allah and kill or are killed. This is a true promise binding on Him in the Torah, the Gospel, and the Quran. And whose promise is truer than Allah’s? So rejoice in the exchange you have made with Him. That is truly the ultimate triumph.

This is still the mindset of any serious Muslim today.

Sex and drugs as identity-killing weapons.

Fast-forward to 1969's Sexual Revolution. Young baby boomers are enthralled by novel drugs like cannabis and psychedelics. Free sex was abundant without the constraint of the Church. Here we see the same process of grooming young people to do the bidding of a master but for different purposes. In our times it's meant to subvert Christians and turn them into sex-obsessed atheists rather than zealous Muslim assassins.

You might think the real assassin's creed was made up of a bunch of crazy Arabs, but that's too simplistic. The assassins employed sophisticated psychological warfare. And that type of war still rages on today. The promise of sex is the most powerful tool for any ruler to gain zealous followers without the use of force.

“Jewish soldiers broke down the doors of my church and robbed many precious and sacred objects. Then they threw the statues of Christ down into a nearby garden.”

This is a quote from a Catholic priest when Zionists were extremely zealous to reclaim the Holy Land. The founding years of Israel were brutal for Palestinian Christians because of Jewish hatred. Attacks were not sporadic or carried out by lone deranged Jews. The persecution of Christians in Israel is systemic, despite freedom of religion by law.

Arson attacks on churches.

Yinon Reuveni and Yehuda Asraf burned down a church in 2015. This church was built in 1984 where Jesus fed 5,000 followers with two loaves of bread and five fish. Such attacks are always followed with empty platitudes from the Israeli government.

President Netanyahu:

“The shocking arson of the church is an attack on all of us. Israel’s freedom of religion is a cornerstone of our values and it is anchored in the law.”

This arson attack is not unique in Israel. Church desecration is common there, so any official statement on the attacks is purely for public relations. Israel has never bothered to seriously crack down on anti-Christian sentiment and attacks.

Spitting on Christians is a Jewish tradition.

Vile Jewish behavior towards Christians is suddenly gaining media attention. Various videos popping up of Jews harassing Christians make it hard for anyone to deny that the former mistreats the latter for no reason. The fundamental reason this tradition exists is that they're Christ killers. Another reason is punishing Christians for their idolatry.

This disgusting practice has been going on for years. But only recently, because of smartphones is it clear for anyone to see how vile Jewish behavior is. Consequently, the issue has been swiftly addressed by the Israeli government. Not that they care for a few goyim but saving face.

“I strongly condemn any attempt to intimidate worshippers, and I am committed to taking immediate and decisive action against it,” - Netanyahu's Office

Activists documenting Jewish behavior can't take this government's attention seriously. Israel hasn't and will never care about Christians except when support falters for their terrorist state.

“Attacks against Christians have 100% increased this year, and not just spitting, but throwing stones and vandalizing signs,” said Harani. “Excuse me,” she added, addressing Israeli authorities. “But where were you?”

Massacring surrendering Arab Christians.

The Israel Defense Force murdered 12 Christians in the village of Eilabun in 1948. This was an act of revenge because of Israeli losses. ALA (Arab Liberation Army) paraded the heads of Israeli soldiers with some of the villagers through the small village. After a Pyrrhic Israeli victory that was part of Operation Hiram, the villagers waved the white flag.

Unsurprisingly, the Israelis were still out for blood. Despite having surrendered and being under complete Zionist control. The Israelis expelled the remaining villagers and picked 12 Christian men from the village to be executed for no apparent reason but revenge for their losses.

A monument was later erected in memory of these Christians which was soon after vandalized, presumably by Jews.

Bombing Christians in Gaza.

Just recently, the Zionist Jews targeted a Greek Orthodox church that was built during the time of the Crusades. The site was home to a much earlier church dating back to 425 AD. Israeli justification was that a Hamas commander took shelter in the nearby area.

Entire Christian families were nearly wiped out in a single airstrike. At least 16 were reported dead. Jewish recklessness is encouraged by the rest of the world if it means that Hamas is getting a beating. Collateral be damned. Especially if they're Christians because this story gained little if any attention from the media.

Thankfully, the church is mostly intact. The adjacent buildings were utterly destroyed. But this wasn't out of Israeli consideration. The main church building could be obliterated for all the Israelis care.

I have left out and missed many cases of Jewish treatment of Christians but I think these sum up the general behavior of Jews when they're in power. No goyim is allowed to exist according to the teachings of Modern Judaism. This does not mean Jews are outright killing any non-Jew the moment they see them. Goyim can be useful idiots like the Evangelical Protestants who fully support Israel.

But in the end, Jewish belief teaches the eradication of all non-Jews. In their own words, it is Tikkun Olam. Healing the world. You might think of humanitarian acts but in the Jewish context, it means the extermination of goyim.

Subscribe now

Japan is undoubtedly the global exemplar of a Westernized nation without inheriting the apathetic attitude of godless Europeans. One can argue Japanese are pagans or atheists, but this betrays a deep ignorance of Bushido and its ancient roots.

Applying a Western standard for being an atheist to the Japanese will fail. The Western mind, and the rest of the world, should first grasp the uniqueness of Japan's culture before feudalism was abolished in 1870. Bushido was the 'official' operating system of Japan. Understood by Westerners as a military principle much like Christian Knighthood. Although it's foolish to say Bushido ceased to exist because of a political transition from feudalism.

Deep-rooted and powerful as is still the effect of Bushido, I have said that it is an unconscious and mute influence. - Inazo Nitobe, Bushido: The Soul Of Japan

Post-feudal Japanese inherited the knightly virtues. In many cases unknowingly. Their high sense of honor, almost worship even, is proof of that. Duty to family and country is notoriously evident in their work ethic. Labor for a Japanese isn't based on individual freedom nor a means to make money an American would understand it. Their worth of being is at stake. If the fruits of their work do not reflect what they've inherited from Bushido it would be akin to committing a Christian sin. Again, without consciously knowing it. Especially for the younger generations.

The atheist West idolizes the safety and cleanliness of the Japanese. Understandably so because they've managed to create a great civilization for themselves without a Christian government, so it seems. But Japanese worship of honor and ancestors, which they do unknowingly, has its faults. Their neglect of metaphysical training and sense of honor is responsible for their extreme sensitivity. Bushido is ultimately a man-made arbitrary set of principles. Granted, the Japanese followed the law written on their hearts as one of the best in the world, if not the best. European knights had the privilege of knowing Christ. Europe had the gift of Greek metaphysics and Hebrew history to ground morality in a being higher than men. The samurai did not.

Shinto and nationalism.

Modern Japanese sometimes perform Shinto rituals. They visit shrines when it suits them. Shinto ceased to be relevant politically with the end of World War 2. Shinto did not provide a code of conduct like Christianity does. Offerings were made for the safety of Japan, but it was never truly a religion. A national ethic is more accurate. Thus, Bushido acts as the Japanese's 'Ten Commandments'. So Japan doesn't worship gods like the Hindus do. This explains why India is chaotic whereas Japan is orderly.

Christian missionaries failed spectacularly by ignoring 'heathen records'. Missionaries claimed Christianity to be a new religion which did not sit well with the samurai. You can't rip out the deep roots of Bushido, whether good or bad, and expect people to follow. No. Christians must realize that the soul of Japan is in many ways similar to the former's ethics

It is an old, old story, which, if presented in intelligible words, that is to say, if expressed in the vocabulary familiar in the moral development of a people, will find easy lodgment in their hearts, irrespective of race or nationality. - Inazo Nitobe, Bushido: The Soul Of Japan

Japan is in many respects ideal.

• Clean and safe streets

• Universal politeness

• Incredibly considerate

• Exceptional work ethic

• Homogenous

• Politicians who don't actively hate Japan

But it has its flaws which are becoming a stereotype. Usually exaggerated but true at its core. Japan suffers from a lack of ultimate meaning. The pressure of excelling in school and their careers weigh heavily on our Nippon friends. It's not uncommon for them to emotionally break down when met with defeat. Without honor, there is no other comfort the world can offer. Suicide ''naturally'' becomes an option in this case.

A Christian lives with the same pressures albeit differently. Christians are content with the possibility of losing it all. Family, friends, reputation, finances, etc. In the end, we have our God Jesus Christ to comfort us in times of crisis. The near non-existence of metaphysics, as earlier stated, is at fault here for Japan. Neither philosophy nor theology could ever really flourish in Japan which denied the Japanese of knowing God. The Japanese have an extremely hard time coping with failure because worldly excellence is the highest virtue because, in their culture, there is no such thing as a God to lean on for your troubles.

Honor is the highest virtue which is inherited from Bushido. How asinine is it to degrade Japanese to mere pagans, adherents of Shintoism in the way Hindus are to Shiva? Bushido runs unfathomably deep in the Japanese as explained by Nitobe:

Scratch a Japanese of the most advanced ideas, and he will show a samurai. - Inazo Nitobe, Bushido: The Soul Of Japan

Bushido has vanished as a code of ethics. But its soul still remains strong in the descendants of samurai. Do you admire them for their cleanliness? Then all credit is due to their chivalric ethics similar to Christian knighthood.

Ages after, when its customaries will have been buried and its very name forgotten, its odors will come floating in the air as from a far-off, unseen hill. - Inazo Nitobe, Bushido: The Soul Of Japan

Christianity and Bushido not the same?

Comparing samurai to the knights triggers anti-Christians. They bring up examples of violent Parisian streets or meth junkies in Philadelphia, USA. These are false equivalents because the Biden admin is Jewish. European metropolitan areas are completely run by atheists and cultural Marxists. The West is being terrorized with literal boatloads of African and Muslim invaders, financed by Jewish NGOs. None of this is happening in Japan because its rulers don't hate their taxpayers.

Jewish Klaus Schwab, head of the WEF, publicly bragged about ''penetrating the cabinets'' and grooming the next generation of world leaders. The current state of the West is not a reflection of Christian ethics. Far from it.

Japan is fortunate enough to carry on the Bushido code in its soul. The samurai code still oozes in almost every aspect of their society, while Europe ceased to be Christian with the active deconstruction of the Church during Vatican 2 and the CIA's undermining of sexual morality. But one could argue it is thanks to the seeds of the Reformation. Japan's isolationist policies have prevented cataclysmic events like these. So the samurai's spiritual and social issues can be solved by converting to Christianity. From there, they should carry on as usual.

Subscribe now

Your average consumer is obsessed with magic, and it shows in their entertainment interests such as Harry Potter, The Witcher, and Lord of the Rings. To be fair, Tolkien handled magic well in LOTR. There was a clear distinction between the good and evil use of magic. Gandalf sparingly used magic in the entire trilogy. Only using magic when absolutely necessary because even a god-like wizard knows not to f*** around with magic.

Tolkien as a Catholic believed that God is the ultimate authority. He imagined a monotheistic-like God into his LOTR universe which implies the existence of an absolute moral standard. Hence, Gandalf's thoughtful use of magic.

Is magic real?

Magic as an independent force isn't real. But there are forces in this world that could be interpreted as such. Such as manifesting, demonic rituals, and witchcraft. Magic is seen as a tool to achieve selfish ends. Magic is an attempt to be the author of reality. This is why magic is often practiced in elite circles or people who are 'spiritual but not religious'. Practicing magic isn’t about acquiring fire spells. It's about playing god in your own little world.

The Witcher's magic cabal.

In this book series and now Netflix show, magic is used without discretion. In it, there exists a secret Lodge of Sorceresses who aim for political supremacy. They scheme and plot to take down sovereign kingdoms for the betterment of all races. Their foundation is built upon the belief that they're superior to their male counterparts. These sorceresses are so deluded and self-absorbed, that they truly believe that the most vile evils justify the end. I'm talking about mass genocide kind of evil.

The Witcher often portrays regular humans as racists and xenophobes. But who wouldn't be xenophobic if a sorcerer could level your entire continent with a spell? Who wouldn't question a particular tribe in human history who owns the banks and nuclear codes? Yet we're supposed to sympathize with them. Maturity makes one sympathize with the racist peasant because he simply wants to be left alone.

Magic TV shows inevitably run these themes:

• Secret cabal.

• Superiority complex.

• Psychopathy.

• Social justice.

• Arbitrary morality.

Because The Witcher doesn't have a fleshed-out 'theology' like LOTR it only makes sense that individuals such as witches aren't held back by a moral standard. This sends a bad message to impressionable viewers because it popularizes the Nietzschean Überwitch. Power is all that matters.

The Witch Archetype.

This archetype is becoming extremely popular. Look at Western women. Their main occupations are hedonism and education. Abortion is normal for them i.e. child sacrifice. Most of them behave like witches without explicitly identifying as such. It’s not a coincidence primarily Western women are attracted to witchcraft. They have been tempted since the first wave of feminism. And now amplified by the Sexual Revolution. The rest of the world is merely catching up to this trend under the guise of democracy and individual freedom. Celebrating these basic human rights is a pipeline to reveling in abortion and transsexuality. The last two I mentioned are rebellious acts to shun children. That’s basically what witchcraft boils down to. It justifies immoral behavior because in their mind objective morality isn't real. From there on, anything goes.

Entertainment or psyop?

Not every magical show is a psyop. Some are rooted in European folklore. But big studios are heavily invested in twisting original works of fiction. Hollywood's writers admit they usually hate the source material. Female side characters are being put on pedestals for the sake of representing strong independent women. Especially the ones practicing witchcraft. They don’t push witchcraft because they truly believe in it. It’s just super effective for social engineering as proven by the popularity of TV shows running this theme.

Subscribe now

When you look back on the greatest civilizations in history, none of them were atheists by any stretch. Atheist outliers would be shunned from the tribe. The Babylonians, Mesopotamians, Romans, Egyptians, and Greeks were all pagans and mostly wrong in their beliefs. They were smart and healthy enough to not even consider atheism as the state religion. It didn't even cross their collective mind. Not even registered.

Many tragic events happened during the Christian periods because of heresy and Roman prosecution, but not even the greatest of heretics went down the path of godlessness. He was simply not apathetic enough. Or brainwashed. Not a single time period since Adam was predominantly atheist. Fast-forward to today, and now the average man claims to be agnostic at best. A fence sitter. Which is not too bad considering the mass demoralization in Western society. You could be worse, a militant atheist, anti-theist.

Out of arrogance and zero self-awareness does the atheist claim: we know better now. We are not like our savage ancestors. We use common sense now.

Apparently, it's more rational and logical to believe that evolution is the answer to all the big questions. And if you don't believe that billions of years can shape human consciousness, you're an unwashed savage. The oblivious atheist's cop-out and sheer lack of self-awareness bring him to the conclusion that the answer for creation is time. A lot of time. Just give something a billion, gazillion years, and eventually, a monkey can paint a Van Gogh. Eventually, science will figure out through AI and algorithms what absolute truth is on morality and progress. This is what you call an appeal to mystery, which the atheists accuse the theists of.

A more common form of the atheist's denial of reality is their so-called independence from a religious crutch. They're strong-willed individuals who don't need a fairy tale to emotionally support them. Religion, especially Christianity, isn't solely an emotional crutch. It's a historical and undeniable metaphysical truth. To deny religion is to deny reality itself.

The atheist therefore lacks a foundation for morality. Without God, morality becomes arbitrary. You can see how this leads to the genocide of unborn babies. Abortion is rationalized as health care. Homosexuality is rationalized as natural. Prosecuting Christians is rationalized as progress. This is why I call atheists unaware. Because of their pride and blind faith in science, they have become slaves to those who control the narrative of mainstream science.

COVID-19 proves my point. We live in a so-called rational and secular society yet 90% jumped on the experimental vaccine that's causing excess deaths. And after their sixth booster, they remain blind. They took the shot and deep down they knew there was no going back, so they doubled down. Or just ignore the issue out of shame. We possess the greatest library humanity will ever have access i.e. the Internet. Yet, the vast majority isn't bothered to seek the objective truth on anything. I blame atheism.

Atheism makes you apathetic, arrogant, wrathful, prideful, nihilistic, depressed, confused and empty. It's not normal to be in any of these states, hence why atheism is a mental illness and should be classified as a clinical disease.

Subscribe now

Christianity and Islam are irreconcilably different. I will point out why that is because our Jewish masters force us to live together and sing kumbayah together in the name of tolerance.

So the best way to contrast the differences is to read about their character and teachings. This is about the exemplars of each religion. The persons that started the two biggest religions of the world. To be a perfect Christian means to model Jesus. And a perfect Muslim, to be like Muhammad. Everyone could agree on that. Muslims claim their prophet is the greatest man ever to live and Jesus is the epitome of perfection according to Christians.

I'll draw from historical accounts like the Gospels and Hadiths (Muhammad's life) to determine what both characters were like. Whether you believe the historical accounts are reliable or not, what matters is how they're depicted. Islamic tradition and Sahih Bukhari will be the main sources for determining who Muhammad was because they're the most trusted sources for mainstream Muslims (Sunni). Verses are taken from sunnah.com. You won't read non-Islamic sources about him.

Let's begin with Muhammad:

Muhammad's father died before he was born. Orphaned at the age of 6 and consequently adopted by his uncle. He married Khadijah at 25 when she was 40 and worked for her as a merchant. Muhammad took no other wives until she died. (Khadijah's age is not confirmed by the hadiths but comes from secondary sources.)

The Muslim prophet was a pagan for most of his life. He learned of Judaism and Christianity by interacting with Jews in the Arabian Peninsula. He greatly respected and affirmed the word of God given to the Jews. At 40, he started to receive revelations. Furthermore, he was disturbed by them but was reassured by his wife and cousin. He preached publicly about it much later. Opposition came after he denied the existence of other gods.

The situation in Mecca became unsafe because of his teachings. Muhammad's clan took refuge in Medina. Muhammad's relations deteriorated with the local Jewish tribes over time. 18 months after he emigrated, Muhammad raided Meccan caravans. During one of the raids, A Meccan force retaliated but was defeated by the Medinan Muslims. The Meccans launched two more campaigns to conquer Medina but failed.

After the wars, Muhammad personally oversaw the beheading of 700-900 adult men of the Qurayzah tribe. Including young teenage boys if they grew pubic hair. The remaining women and children were enslaved. Muhammad gained momentum after these battles. He continued to lay siege on the Jewish oasis Khaybar. The Jews were allowed to remain by sending tribute to Muhammad.

Meccan allies waged a war against the allies of Muhammad. In response, the prophet took up arms and laid siege to Mecca. The Meccans submitted to Muhammad. Afterward, he embarks on a campaign to the Syrian borders to put the locals under his submission in 630.

He died in 632 after a Jewish woman poisoned him four years prior.

Sahih Bukhari 5:59:713:

Narrated `Aisha: The Prophet (ﷺ) in his ailment in which he died, used to say, \"O `Aisha! I still feel the pain caused by the food I ate at Khaibar, and at this time, I feel as if my aorta is being cut from that poison.

Muhammad cursed the Jews and Christians in Allah's name as one of his last words before dying.

Sahih al-Bukhari 435, 436:

When the last moment of the life of Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) came he started putting his 'Khamisa' on his face and when he felt hot and short of breath he took it off his face and said, \"May Allah curse the Jews and Christians for they built the places of worship at the graves of their Prophets.\" The Prophet (ﷺ) was warning (Muslims) of what those had done.

Another significant fact is Muhammad betrothed his wife Aisha when she was 6 years old and penetrated her at 9.

Sahih al-Bukhari 5134:

Narrated `Aisha: that the Prophet (ﷺ) married her when she was six years old and he consummated his marriage when she was nine years old. Hisham said: I have been informed that `Aisha remained with the Prophet (ﷺ) for nine years (i.e. till his death).

But Muhammad wasn't a monogamist. He had 9 wives whom he often shared nights with.

Sahih al-Bukhari 5068:

Narrated Anas: The Prophet (ﷺ) used to go round (have sexual relations with) all his wives in one night, and he had nine wives.

To understand Muhammad's conquering tendencies we must look into his motivation. That is to spread Allah's truth.

Sahih al-Bukhari 392:

Narrated Anas bin Malik: Allah's Messenger (ﷺ) said, "I have been ordered to fight the people till they say: 'None has the right to be worshipped but Allah.' And if they say so, pray like our prayers, face our Qibla and slaughter as we slaughter, then their blood and property will be sacred to us and we will not interfere with them except legally and their reckoning will be with Allah.

You'll be free to choose to pay Jizyah (taxes) for being non-Muslim or face Jihad (holy war) when you refuse to pay according to Muhammad.

Muslims aren't commanded to kill you outright. Under sharia (Islamic law) you'll be considered a brother if you choose to convert. Whether out of your own free will or because of death threats.

Now let's look at Jesus' life:

Jesus was born in Bethlehem to Joseph and Mary. With Joseph as his legal father. Mary conceived as a virgin through the Holy Spirit. Because of Herod's threat to kill every two-year-old and under, the holy family fled to Egypt.

Jesus, Mary, and Joseph returned to Nazareth when Herod died. Growing up, Jesus spent much time in the Synagogue and was incredibly learned as a child. Not much is known about his life prior to his public ministry.

John 21:25:

Now there are also many other things that Jesus did. Were every one of them to be written, I suppose that the world itself could not contain the books that would be written.

He was a carpenter as Joseph was for most of his adult life. But his first significant public act was being baptized by John the Baptist. At Cana in Galilee, He performed his first sign of divinity. He turned water into wine. Followed by many other signs such as resurrecting the dead and healing the sick.

Now he gained many followers by teaching. A pivotal moment was his Sermon On The Mount. Jesus showed how radically different He is from other gods and their teachings.

• Love your enemies

• You shall not commit adultery

• Blessed are the peacemakers

What's so pivotal about Jesus' teachings is the blow against the status quo. The Pharisees. They hated Him. Jesus taught that salvation isn't achieved through legalism but through a true change of heart. A change of faith. He wants your heart, and you can only give it to Him freely. That makes Jesus' teaching unique.

Matthew 6:1:

Beware of practicing your righteousness before men to be noticed by them; otherwise you have no reward with your Father who is in heaven.

A crucial moment in Christ's teaching. He sets himself apart from teachers like the prophets that came before Him by being the authority as written in the verse below.

Matthew 7:28-29:

When Jesus had finished these words, the crowds were amazed at His teaching; for He was teaching them as one having authority, and not as their scribes.

Jesus was arrested by the Pharisees. His claims of being God got Him killed by the Jewish authorities. He willingly got along because He was there to fulfill the prophecies of the Old Testament.

After being brutalized, bleeding, and hanging on the Cross His heart was set on forgiveness.

Luke 23:34:

Jesus said, “Father, forgive them, for they do not know what they are doing.” And they divided up his clothes by casting lots.

After his crucifixion and resurrection, he stayed for 40 days with His mother and disciples. He ascended into heaven as witnessed by his disciples.

Luke 24:50–53:

And he led them out as far as Bethany, and lifting up his hands he blessed them. While he blessed them, he parted from them and was carried up into heaven. And they worshiped him and returned to Jerusalem with great joy, and were continually in the temple blessing God.

You're going to have to come up with your own conclusion about Jesus' and Muhammad's character. However, one thing is certain, with such striking differences, it's impossible to find peace among Christians and Muslims if they truly follow their role model. Unity between them is a lie.

Subscribe now

You can’t answer this question because the term ‘‘racism’’ is popularized by Jewish Leon Trotsky. The original reason to use the term was to leverage its power which is what Trotsky did, and his adherents still do in 2023 and beyond.

With that out of the way, we can continue like adults.

It’s ingrained that racism can only come from white Christians. Even those who are aware of its political abuse are somewhat afraid to have racial preferences, much so let it be verbally known to friends and family. Blacks who prefer other blacks in the dating scene are empowered by the establishment and blue-haired liberals. Only whites i.e. Caucasians do not have the privilege to say this out loud about how they feel toward their own race unless it's negative.

Race preference is only racist by arbitrary standards made up by a Jew. To use the word racist before discussing race preference is already a lost cause because the vast majority believes in the definition in the previous paragraph. It’s best to not engage in this discussion at all because of the preconceived notion about the unsaid privileges non-whites have that whites don't.

Wanting your kids to look like you is natural. Who wouldn't want an identical copy of themselves? It's the only worldly way to live forever. To deny and actively destroy the possibility of marrying within your race is an attack on your identity. Without the latter, a nation is vulnerable when done on a mass scale as we're seeing in Western Europe.

Advertisements constantly barrage you with black-white interracial couples which is obviously a means to demoralize. In reality, these relationships do not last, in fact, few actually engage in African-European dating, much less marriage. But of course in contrast with the 19th century U.S.A., for example, there's a major boom of interracial relationships.

Quite remarkable that Asians are dramatically more likely to intermarry compared to whites and pretty much every other race. Remarkable because Asian countries experience almost zero Jewish-funded interracial propaganda compared to Westerners, yet they're the ones drinking the Kool-Aid. But knowing the general Asian mindset it would make sense. They're less concerned about transcendents, and much more pragmatic worldly pursuits. Dating a Westerner means ''dating up'' in the Asian world. Whether that is objectively true is a story for another time.

If we have to believe Pew Research, whites prefer to marry within their own race. This is problematic because it goes against the agenda of creating a technocratic monolithic, rootless culture. Whites are being targeted with ruthless race-mixing propaganda simply because a cohesive family unit isn't profitable.

Identifying solely as white is exactly where they want you to be so that they can use ''racism'' against you. Labeling you as a white supremacist strips you of any rights opposed to identifying with nationality and religion. But holding a personal racial preference isn't wrong. It should be encouraged without deluding yourself with genetic determinist idiocy because white and Jewish supremacy are two sides of the same coin. Implying there is no free will. Only race makes you a chosen one. Both are very similar in worldview. If genetic determinism is true there should be no laws holding blacks accountable for looting cities or Arabs massacring Europeans with AK-47s and running them over with trucks in Sweden. If race is everything, then we should have no problem with Jews running central banks and pornography. It's in their blood so they can't help themselves by that logic.

Subscribe now

Why does mental illness skyrocket in the 21st century? We possess the most significant library of knowledge that would make the Library of Alexandria blush if it were a woman. But the more knowledge we seem to gain the more retarded we become as a collective society. We know exercise is good, yet obesity is rampant. We know God is real, yet atheism is surging. Furthermore, we know sunlight is good, yet we stay inside all day. Yet there is a mental illness pandemic.

Homosexuality, transgenderism, and other fetishes are no longer labeled as mental illnesses so Big Pharma can profit from these people. How? Well, whether we label them or not. They're still mentally ill. Which means they still have a desperate need to heal their mind and soul. This need is ''fulfilled'' by expensive psychiatry sessions concluded by an upsell of pharmaceutical drugs to cure their depression and anxiety.

The American Psychiatric Association blames prejudice, discrimination, and internalized homophobia. This is not stupidity. This is genius on their part. By not addressing the root cause of their depression, homosexuality, they'll never be cured—an endless stream of money for Big Pharma.

Sigmund Freud pioneered psychiatry by selling rich American clients, usually Jewish, psychiatric sessions to allegedly cure them of their guilt. The client had to lie down, sit still, and share their deepest secrets. Freud concluded all mental illness stems from repressed sexual desires. And understanding the contemporary times of Freud, it's easy to know where he's coming from.

Puritanism was the culture. A fake form of Christian sexual morality. An extreme form of sexual restraint that is unnatural. Puritanism pushes people to act on their sexual passions in secret. Freud rightly called this out, but his cure is even worse. By pioneering sexual liberation as the cure for mental illnesses, he unleashed entire fields of pseudo-science to normalize sexual decadence like homosexuality. As a result, the Sexual Revolution took place, and consequently, we're dealing with rampant degeneracy which is getting worse to the point of pedophilia and sex with animals.

But I say let them overplay their hand. The counter-reaction will only be greater in aggression and scale. My purpose is to show you none of your sexual desires outside God's moral law are natural. Masturbating, homosexuality, transgenderism, and even ''minor'' fetishes.

Subscribe now

Continuing from my previous article on the treatment of Christians in an Islamic state, we'll fast-forward a couple of centuries. The Ottoman Empire lasted for nearly 500 years and peaked in 1683 stretching from Mecca to Budapest and Algiers.

Praised for its administrative and cultural progress, the Ottomans would be much kinder in their treatment of non-Muslims, right? Well, I hate to say it but not much has changed since the 8th century Islamic Spain.

Time hasn't been kind to Christians living in a state ruled by Muslims. Sharia law is after all based on the unchanging word of Allah. Invention would be anti-Islamic. Anatolian Christians flee Turkish terror.

Here's a letter from Manuel II Paleologos to Demetrios Kydones in 1391 about how the Greek Christians...

"have fled to the clefts in the rocks, to the forests, and to the mountain heights in an effort to escape a death from which there is no escape, a very cruel and inhuman death without any semblance of justice…. Nobody is spared, neither very young children nor defenseless women. For those whom old age or illness prevents from running away, there is no hope of escaping the murderous blade.

This is much in line with (Quran 9:29). Very Islamic of the Muslim Turks. Christian persecution in the Ottoman Empire was much in line with the commands of Muhammad. (Sahih Muslim 1767).

Rivers of blood in Constantinople.

Muslims were not unique in pillaging and mass rapes after a victorious battle. But their teachings command such things as opposed to Christian doctrine. It took the jihadis 700 years to capture the Christian jewel of the east. The Muslims raided monasteries, and homes and desecrated the Hagia Sophia which was the grandest church in Europe for a millennium.

A letter to the Doge of Venice from Byzantine scholar Bessarion after the fall:

Sacked by the most inhuman barbarians and the most savage enemies of the Christian faith, by the fiercest of wild beasts. The public treasure has been consumed, private wealth has been destroyed, and the temples have been stripped of gold, silver, jewels, the relics of the saints, and other most precious ornaments. Men have been butchered like cattle, women abducted, virgins ravished, and children snatched from the arms of their parents.

Such is the fate of the defeated by Muslim hands. They are strangers to noble conduct. No self-control, held back by nothing but the teachings of Muhammad. The lust for sexual gratification, material wealth, and slaughter of infidels is the operating system of a jihadi.

By the order of Sultan Mehmet II, the ancient church Hagia Sophia was turned into a mosque. After his victory, Mehmet sought some needed relaxation and demanded a Christian boy to accompany him. The father of the boy refused and consequently, the teen was killed.

Second-class citizens in the Ottoman Empire.

Despite systemic discrimination, non-Muslims did experience periods of relaxation of Sharia law enforcement. But only when the Muslim elite had bigger problems on their plate, or it depended on the temperament of the current caliph, sultan, emir, etc.

Like in Islamic Spain, Christians, and Jews were second-class citizens (dhimmis) in the Ottoman Empire. They had to pay Jizya tax for keeping their ancestral religion. Humiliation and beatings were part of it just like in any other Sharia nation.

Dhimmis enjoyed freedom but under certain conditions. They could not attempt to convert Muslims or show any signs of devotion. The inferior status of dhimmis was made absolutely clear to prevent integration (Quran 9:29). The Muslim superiority complex is attributed to their acceptance of the ''final prophet Muhammad''. Dhimmis could enjoy higher positions, but that depended on the laxity of Sharia enforcement.

Ottoman rape of Christian boys.

It's quite known that the Ottoman elite had homosexual tendencies. Liberals have often attributed this ''habit'' to the Greeks because the Greeks were obviously all raging homosexuals while wrestling nude 24/7.

But that's in the mind of a secular historian. Reality tells us something different and far more controversial. Even Islamophobic.

Homosexuality in Muslim harems dates back to 10th-century caliphs and even Muhammad himself. Al-Adab Al-Mufrad 1183 is an example of boy love in Islam:

Then he said, 'Where is the little one? Call the little one to me.' Hasan came running and jumped into his lap. Then he put his hand in his beard. Then the Prophet, may Allah bless him and grant him peace, opened his mouth and put his mouth in his mouth. Then he said, O Allah, I love him, so love him and the one who loves him!'

Homosexuality in Islam was usually limited to the Muslim elite. For the common folk, it was a crime punishable by death.

Suzerainty and the boy tax.

A suzerainty is a sovereign state under certain conditions. As the Ottoman Empire gobbled up the Byzantine Empire, smaller states like Wallachia and Moldavia came under threat of invasion. Although, they could prevent such a thing by becoming suzerainty.

This ''freedom'' of independence came with a devastating cost. Usually in gold and young Christian boys. Most of them were groomed and trained to be elite Janissary fighters. The most beautiful boys were picked to serve in the Sultan's harem as köçek dancers.

Later this became an annual event. Devshirme forced Christian fathers to appear in town squares with their sons so that they could be taken away, forever. Even if the boy could return, there was usually little or no desire to because of Islamic indoctrination.

The Ottoman millet system.

Ottomans enforced Sharia law but utilized a different system than 8th-century Umayyad Muslims. The millet system grouped various people according to their religion or creed. Orthodox Christians belonged to one millet. Only one of them represented the entire group and was responsible for paying the Jizya tax or any other dealings with the Muslim elite. Millets enjoyed some autonomy and their leader could pass legislative laws only applicable to those he represented.

But ultimately, every Ottoman subject adhered to Sharia law.

The Barbary slave trade.

While being autonomous from the Ottoman Empire, the Barbary States were an extension of Ottoman savagery. Located along the North African coast which is now Morocco, Algiers, Tunisia, and Libya.

Barbary pirates' primary goal was capturing Europeans for the Muslim slave trade. Sometimes these slaves comprised Jews, Persians, and even Muslims. Naturally, Muslims protested against being enslaved. But the Moroccan Sultan's answer was clear: disbelief. Muslim rulers can arbitrarily decide who is a real Muslim. If you're not, you'll be treated the same as any unbeliever.

In general, it was Christians and other non-Muslims who comprised the bulk of the slave population in the Barbary states. Not to mention, the Ottoman Empire. You'd think jihad raids were limited to the Mediterranean but no. Muslim corsairs ventured to the south of England to capture innocent Christian children, women, and men.

In 1625, Muslim pirates stormed the local parishes and set towns ablaze. They seized 60, 80 and in another case 200 Englishmen to be shipped off to Morocco for a life of slavery. Surah Al-Ahzab Ayat 50 (33:50)

Robert Adams, a former Barbary slave, recounted that he and other slaves were only given ''a littell coarse bread and water.'' Their living quarters weren't exactly Four Seasons style either. Adams continues: ''a dungeon under ground, wher some 150 or 200 of us lay, altogether, having no comforte of the light, but a littell hole.''

In 1660, Muslim pirates focussed on capturing American colonial ships. Muslims did not discriminate between unbelievers. Enslaving the kafir (non-Muslims) is according to Islamic law. The corsairs were devout Muslims.

Technically, the Barbary states were a suzerainty of the Ottomans. In practice, they enjoyed total freedom. Tributes sent to the Ottomans were rare if they occurred at all. From a big-picture Islamic perspective, the Barbary States served as a massive jihad thorn in the side of Europeans. The Ottomans could focus on more important wars.

Byzantine Emperor Manuel II Paleogus on Islam.

Manuel II had dealt with Islam his entire life. He lived from 1350 to 1425. He traveled to Europe to meet with the pope and kings of France and England for aid against the Ottoman menace.

A year before he died he sought help from the Hungarian but alas, it failed and forced the emperor to continue paying tribute to the Ottoman sultanate. Manuel II had firsthand experience with the Muslim treatment of Christians. No man could speak of Islam's fruits more accurately than he. This hatred of non-Muslims is rooted in (Quran 48:29).

Pope Benedict XVI quoted the emperor:

Show me just what Mohammed brought that was new, and there you will find things only evil and inhuman, such as his command to spread by the sword the faith he preached.

Armenian Genocide 1915-1917.

The Ottoman Empire was on its last legs during this period. The Turks saw the Armenians as an existential threat because of an apparent rebellion. This wasn't the case, but the Muslims carried out the systemic destruction of Christian Armenians anyway.

Estimates between 800,000 and 1.2 million Armenians were sent on death marches to the Syrian Desert. Muslim paramilitary escorted them and while traveling the former raped, robbed, and massacred.

Armenians were usually not killed on sight in their villages. The Ottoman administration intended to repurpose abandoned homes and structures to permanently change the demographics of Anatolia. The Turkification of Anatolia is built on a mountain of Christian corpses. Once the remaining survivors arrived in the Syrian Desert, they were put into concentration camps. Armenians were either killed, forced into labor, or sold on slave markets in Damascus while displayed naked. Rape and sexual abuse of Armenian women were routine for the Muslims. Some of the Armenian women landed in Arabian slave markets to satisfy the need of Muslim Hajj pilgrims.

A reminder, this happened in the 20th century. A little over 100 years ago and continues to this day primarily in West Africa to Christian Africans. The Turkish government still denies that the Armenian Genocide happened.

As I mentioned in my previous article, Islam gives you 3 options:

• Convert to Islam.

• Pay Jiyza tax.

• Be executed for refusing Jiyza or conversion.

This has been consistently applied by the Ottomans.

Islam's final breath.

The Ottoman Empire was truly the last Muslim power to command large jihadi armies. The dissolution of the empire was in 1922. Islam has been a dead religion for over a century because without jihad there can be no real Islam. Without enforced Sharia, Islam is dead. Islam can only exist in a perpetual state of warfare against the unbelievers. (Quran 8:59-60) (Quran 9:5) (Quran 2:190-193).

In the last century, it has been a useful tool for American and British intelligence to stamp down nationalistic regimes. The CIA radicalizes Muslim men but ''radicalizing'' means enabling the latter with finances and weaponry. Today, Islam is held back by a lack of political power, numbers, and finances, not because of reformation.

Subscribe now

Race is either completely ignored by Christians or overblown by secular political streams. It's the one thing virtually none can have a sincere discussion about. You can't say nigger anymore, not even in an unattached academic sense. Very few can detach themselves from the race they're born with to discuss genetic differences that could influence certain behavioral patterns.

I believe race should be discussed sincerely in spite of being called a racist. It would only prove my point that they're scared it might reveal unpleasant realities. And so what? It's not the be-all and end-all. Ultimately, your heart and actions define your character, but today I'm going to dive into how race might affect your actions.

Wikipedia's definition of race: Race is a categorization of humans based on shared physical or social qualities into groups generally viewed as distinct within a given society. The definition of race went through multiple changes. In the 16th century, it was used to refer to various groups, not based on biology. In the 17th century, it referred to phenotypical traits. Features you were born with. I believe it's safe to say that race is definitely based on biological reality, just like how we can categorize different races within the same species, such as dogs.

It's not entirely fair to compare humans to dogs racially because dogs have no free will. Although, it's certainly a fact that various dog races behave differently from each other. Such is the case with humans. Ultimately, humans can't entirely credit or blame race for behaving a certain way because God gave us a soul. All humans are accountable for their actions contrary to animals.

Comparing world views.

On the most liberal side of Christians are the ''one race, the human race'' types who believe that race is simply decorative, purely skin color. That only your faith truly matters. While I agree with the last point, I think it's too simplistic because there are many factors that influence your actions. On the opposite end are Christians convinced that only whites are the descendants of Adam and that all the 'brown' races have no chance of redemption. They are damned from the start because of their muddled blood. The general Christian perspective is that race is irrelevant to your salvation.

Behavioral tendencies.

We shouldn't ignore how Oriental races fared much better culturally compared to Amazonian tribes. Or how pagan Romans constructed aqueducts and the Colosseum, while Negroids in West Africa lived in mud huts Not all Negroids lived like that, and not all Romans were sophisticated aristocrats, but we can see a trend in the various races. How they would generally act without the teachings of Christ.

Look at this graph showing you that race can be genetically categorized. You can't tell me race doesn't have some effect on behavior based on genetic studies. Were European barbarians wholly savage?

Dr. E. Michael Jones has a take on this, but I have to disagree with some points. He claims that Christianity taught the Germanic barbarians how to work. Without Christianity, they'd still be chasing pigs in the forest. Yes, Christianity elevated Germany to unprecedented levels, but they weren't completely ignorant of efficient working methods. The Germans were fierce in battle, their women chaste and virtuous, and the chiefs led by example. They were a formidable force even for the 'civilized' Romans. This implies that the Germans used tactics and strategies, far from the barbaric image Dr. Jones paints.

Caesar's comments on the Britons.

Julius Caesar's account of the Britons is also evidence of ''barbarians'' using advanced tactics in battle. Further, proves that a Caucasian race without Christianity knew about sophisticated war tactics, trade, and construction.

The island has a large population, with many buildings constructed after the fashion of the Gauls, and abounds in flocks. For money they use either gold coins or bars of iron of a certain weight. - Julius Caesar

Britons took the Romans by surprise with hit-and-run chariot tactics. Never been seen before by the Romans, hence why Caesar took note of it. Britannia was a country shrouded in mystery and tales of barbarism yet what the Romans saw was in some aspects not much different from their own culture.

At first, the charioteers ride in all directions, usually throwing the ranks into confusion by the very terror caused by the horses, as well as the noise of the wheels. - Julius Caesar

Bushido and Christlike teachings.

Feudal Japan is another example of a high culture without Christ. Bushido permeates Japanese society. It's the way of the Samurai. Politeness, honor, and manners evolved to a state that was on par with the Christian knights. The Bushido code of Japan is still the modus operandi of contemporary Japanese and a far cry from being a complete savage. Is Bushido perfect? No, but Bushido does teach some Christlike virtues, such as compassion and honesty.

Bushido is quite unique compared to the rest of Asian culture. Perhaps Japanese DNA does affect their personality. Although, it's far from the defining factor of their overall behavior. But with every example I just gave, none of them reached the perfect teachings of Christ, and you can't blame them for it. Every human is made in the image of God. The law is written on every heart, so without the revelations of Christ, we'd still be able to intuitively feel what's right and wrong. The flaw in relying on the heart is that you have no way of knowing whether your moral judgments are objectively true.

IQ and race.

Despite all races being human, some races are simply born with a lower IQ, which is indisputable according to various statistics. Environment, nutrition, and upbringing can change your IQ, but genetics ultimately defines in what range you'll end up.

It bothers me when emotions shut down sincere questions about race and IQ. Even from fellow Christians. Yes, we're responsible for our behavior. We're all equal under Christ Jesus. But why can't we entertain the thought of race having an effect on your behavior? Look at this statistic from Wikipedia. Are we just going to ignore that race has zero effect on anything? Negroids score significantly lower than Orientals. Caucasians have a similar IQ range across the Western realm. Asians score vastly different from each other which would suggest that 'Asian' is too broad to define someone anywhere east of Greece.

Before Christ, biology did play a bigger role in one's behavior because there was no transcendental moral anchor to dictate your actions. Our pagan ancestors relied much more on fleshly passions, even animalistic tendencies, and whatever felt like the right thing to do. They constructed moral laws, but they were arbitrary, even if they were based on gods and myths.

We used to hate and destroy one another and refused to associate with people of another race or country. Now, because of Christ, we live together with such people and pray for our enemies. - St. Justin Martyr

Pre-Christian history is the greatest case study of how race played and still plays a role in behavior. But thanks to Christ, we know better now. We can finally define objective rationality. Maybe it's a little harder to understand for slow people, but that doesn't make them a lost cause. Christ can change anyone's heart. The ancient world was brutal so we should be thankful for having a moral code i.e. Christianity to hold everyone accountable for their actions. Regardless of whether they're Caucasian or a Negroid.

Race isn't destiny as some neopagans like to believe.

Subscribe now

“And who is so barbarous as not to understand that the foot of a man is nobler than his shoe, and his skin nobler than that of the sheep with which he is clothed.” - Michelangelo

This is one of the most misunderstood topics today because healthy sexuality has been subverted by pornographers and secularists. We struggle to define what the truth is about sexuality and nudity. Our secular masters make us believe it's subjective. It's all taste. No absolute truth. Puritans believe sexuality is inherently evil. The naked body is bad. They're also wrong.

Many young men and women struggle to define what pornography is. When is something pornographic? Is nudity inherently bad? On what basis do we define when something is porn or art We could be looking at the same piece of art displaying nudity while only one of us is driven to lust. How does this happen? It happens because of a selfish mindset which is caused by an obsession with the body, separated from the person who owns it.

In distinguishing the erotic and the pornographic we are really distinguishing two kinds of interests: interest in the embodied person and interest in the body- and, in the sense that I intend, these interests are incompatible. - Roger Scruton, Beauty.

Pornography turns a subject into an object. The object, a female body, is owned by a person. That person is a soul. Porn removes the person from the body, thus corrupting the source of her beauty.

A beautiful nude painting isn't explicit. Botticelli's Birth of Venus is a great example. Venus is portrayed naked, but she doesn't illicit lust. What Botticelli masterfully achieved is covering her body with her own body. She wears an invisible outfit. You don't see that in porn. Porn leaves nothing open to the imagination. Its only purpose is to derange you by addressing demonic sexual fantasies. Porn is solely made to arouse sexual desire. Erotic art portrays the beauty of human sexuality. If you feel aroused by erotic art then the artist made an aesthetic defect. Aesthetic defects happen when the artist paints his subjects in sexually explicit ways or paints too many details of the genitals and breasts. Or too much reality in general.

Erotic art should be transcendent, surreal, and otherworldly. When art mimics the reality of sex too much it becomes like a picture. Pictures are snapshots of reality. Pictures require little effort and patience. There is no room for the artist's own interpretation. That's why porn is almost always recorded and if it's drawn, you see it's always sexually explicit and detailed. Even more explicit because drawn pictures like hentai can exaggerate the female and male body parts.

Nudity in Playboy magazines is different from Boucher's Blond Odalisque. Yes, both contain nudity, but you'll notice straight away, that you don't feel driven to lust by Boucher's painting. The woman in the painting is distant because she could be anyone. She doesn't have an address, a name, or a social media account. You can't fantasize about her because she doesn't appear like a real human being. With Playboy models, it's the complete opposite. You can find endless content about them, driving you into the rabbit hole of sexual decadence. Boucher's painting might provoke sexual thoughts in your mind but keeps you contained in a safe place because you know the woman isn't real. That's a different story from a real woman, photographed and available for your pleasure.

Pornography is a war on beauty and the integrity of our bodies. The case against porn is an inherently good cause because it protects the creation of God. Our bodies are made in the image of Him. Porn desecrates this fact by reducing us, human beings with souls, to nothing more than a piece of flesh to be used for one's selfish sexual desire.

Botticelli's Venus is not erotic: she is a vision of heavenly beauty, a visitation from other and higher spheres, and a call to transcendence. - Roger Scruton, Beauty.

Subscribe now

With Islam trending among adolescents seeking power, it's time to put a light on the history of Islam's treatment of non-Muslims, especially Christians. This algorithmic push of Islam on social media temporarily fills the desire for camaraderie among godless men. You see financially accomplished men praising Islam and becoming Muslim because they'd like a religious spin on their lavish lifestyles.

The common argument for Islam is that it serves as an antidote to moral crimes committed by secular nations. Other common arguments, though fallacious, attract hordes of low-IQ men:

• Islam is true because it's the last religion.

• Muslims defend their religion through violence.

• Rising numbers prove Islam to be true.

• Scientific miracles in the Quran.

• Muhammad was the perfect man.

• Allah is the only monotheistic god.

Muslim marketers often use these one-liners to persuade an ignorant unbeliever to recite the Shahada. (Declaring belief in Islam). It's the only thing you have to say to become a Muslim. Many converts base their conviction on one of the points I mentioned earlier, without reading the Quran or Muhammad's life in the Hadiths.

But if they were to find out how Islam truly treats and has treated non-Muslims, there would be more resistance to reciting the Islamic creed.

In purely Islamic nations, the Muslim is commanded by Allah to fight the unbeliever wherever they might be (Quran 2:191). Presently, not many Muslims adhere to this teaching in practice, but the majority still long for violent jihad like a nostalgic memory.

When a Muslim subjugates an infidel, he is supposed to give him three choices.

• Convert freely to Islam.

• Stay Christian or Jew, but pay taxes and become a dhimmi. (Dhimmis were humiliated, denied basic rights and financially burdened until bankrupt.)

• Refuse both, but face death by execution or war.

One of the first large-scale encounters between Islam and Christianity happened in Spain, or Al-Andalus as it was called under Islamic occupation. It's one of those historical events diluted by liberal propaganda to highlight how tolerant Islam is. How Jews, Muslims, and Christians can coexist peacefully. Well, they did coexist, but it was nothing like the hippie version contemporary morons preach about.

Christians under real Islam.

In general, Christians in Islamic Spain could participate in much of the social and economic life but were forbidden to proselytize, build new churches or show any displays of Christianity such as crosses or ringing bells. Christianity was practically non-existent on the surface. It was expensive and dangerous to be a Christian under real Islam. Christians could only end the daily discrimination and sporadic harassment if they converted to Islam. Muslims threw poop and rocks at priests who were on their way to a cemetery, according to a contemporary account.

Paul Alvarez, a 9th-century Christian, complained of the 'unbearable tax' Muslims levied on non-Muslims.

Abd al-Rahman, a 10th-century caliph, took a thirteen-year-old Christian boy hostage. Rahman was entranced by the boy's beauty, and so he made sexual advances. The Christian boy rejected him. Rahman was enraged, consequently, the boy was tortured and beheaded. Just one of many cases of how Christians were treated by a Muslim leader.

The consequences of climbing the ladder in Islam as a non-Muslim.

Islamic law teaches that non-Muslims can't rule over Muslims. But this wasn't always so because laws have to be enforced to mean anything, as with every law. So there were periods of relaxation in which Jews could enjoy a position of power, as was the case of Samuel ibn Naghrila in the 11th century. Muslims were fully aware of Islamic law and resented him for his powerful political position. Abu Ishaq referred to Jews as apes and pigs, as written in the Quran (2:63-65; 5:59-60; 7:166). Abu incited the Muslims of Granada to riot. They were humiliated by a Jew ruling over Muslims. Consequently, 4000 Jews were murdered, and the mob crucified Joseph, the son of Samuel who also held a position of power. Such is the fate of non-Muslims in an Islamic society if Allah's laws are truly followed.

The End of Islamic Power

Fortunately, Islam holds no real power anymore. There is no caliphate, no jihad armies, and apostate numbers are growing. But we can't forget that Islam is our enemy. Even if they say some ''based'' things about feminism and Jewish oligarchs.

We owe it to the millions of Christians who were murdered, discriminated against, and humiliated by Muslim hands for centuries. We must remember what would happen if Islam were given supreme power over other cultures and people. The desire for domination still runs deep in the Muslim psyche. Dominating through force, not rational discourse is their culture.

Subscribe now

Clothing is a tangible tell of someone's ideology. Clothing physiognomy is real and should be taken seriously. Judging a book by its cover is a good thing, especially when it comes to personal grooming and clothing style. Why? Because clothing is the personal flag you carry on a daily basis. Clothing represents your morality. Clothing is an ethical statement.

We're quick to solely judge women for skimpy attire. But this is surface-level thinking. Critiquing women for wearing lingerie in the gym is basic red pill content. Women are just more sensitive to trends, certainly when a strong father figure is lacking. Clothing, holistically, has been thoroughly raped by Big Fashion and the media which we all suffer from. You, at this very moment, might be unknowingly contributing to the decay of public beauty because of modern fashion.

The state of textiles.

The cultural clothing war goes much deeper than woman dressing (or lack thereof) like whores in public. The fabrics, materials, and methods of processing clothes have never been in a worse state. Literal oil-derived plastic gymwear is being sold at premium prices. Heritage brands such as Barbour downgraded their knitwear by mixing synthetics with wool. Resulting in an uncanny look. And less comfort while the manufacturers rake in more profit.

Style is objective.

Clothing style has taken on a juvenile aesthetic. Nike, Adidas, Calvin Klein, Zara, H&M, and various other fast-fashion brands completely dominate the way people look. Because people don't know any better, conform, or are too unimaginative to create a mature style that fits their body type. 1930 blue-collar workers dressed better than 2023 white-collar employees. Career type is no excuse to dress like a slob in polyester garments. So with that in mind, there's nothing stopping you from dressing objectively good.

You don't have to follow a black-on-white set of rules to be stylish. But there are styles that are objectively beautiful. Just like in the art world. Beauty is objective. Humans can't help themselves but recognize patterns which is why David by Michelangelo attracts millions of visitors each year.

Classical architecture attracts tourists because these structures are objectively beautiful. The same can be said about the general dress code of a nation. How citizens dress is a collective representation of their morals.

When average people think of dressing sharply, they think of overpriced 3-piece suits or expensive streetwear. While there's nothing inherently wrong about any of those, it just goes to show you how low the standard for a decent affordable outfit is. Look into heritage brands such as Peregrine, Harris Tweed, or Barbour to get an idea of a mature, modern yet Western ethnic style. All brands suffer from the plastic menace but these kinds of brands are your best bet at finding quality 100% wool or cotton clothing.\n\n\nHow a Jew popularized toxic polyester.

Polyester is a common fabric. Usually found in gym wear and cheap brands. But very often mixed in with designer fashion to cut costs and increase margins. Polyester is a known endocrine disrupter that lowers fertility and testosterone in both sexes.

Edith Flagg, a Jew, pioneered the use of polyester in the fashion industry. She was the first designer to import the infamous plastic toxin to America post-WW2. Thus, starting the downfall trend of clothing quality. Polyester doesn't merely lower clothing quality or damage your health, it also makes you smell. Cotton has a natural ability to absorb sweat and bacteria, whereas polyester doesn't which leads to consumers seeking out Alzheimer-inducing deodorants. Or harmful detergents that seep into your skin when wearing the ''cleansed fabrics''.

Judaism is inherently irrational so it is unsurprising that a Jew would use polyester for garments.

American Apparel pornography.

Dov Charney is a prime example of an unhinged Jew abusing his power for sexual gratification. Notorious for sexually harassing goyim women. Conducted job interviews in his underwear. Often, if not exclusively he hired attractive young women for his brick-and-mortar stores. And employing said women for (near) pornographic advertisements.\n\nThe brand was synonymous with hipster culture. A prelude to the extreme far-leftist culture permeating Western society. American Apparel supported mass migration and homosexual ideologies such as LGBT. This might be unsurprising considering Charney is a Jew.

Luckily, the company filed bankruptcy due to Charney's Jewish behavior and misuse of American Apparel's funds. In 2017, Gildan Activewear acquired the brand and eliminated the pornographic advertisements.

Is all clothing by Jews bad?

No, but they certainly helped diminish clothing quality, increased prices, and shipped textile labor to the third world. Ralph Lauren is a Jew, his brand remains stylish albeit suffers from synthetics as well.

Homosexual Calvin Klein, who also happens to be Jewish, contributes to semi-pornographic ads. Much less graphic than American Apparel but still unnecessarily erotic. Calvin Klein disturbs consumers by using obese models to promote their underwear. In some cases, black/brown transgenders which is very much in line with Modern Judaism.\n\nThere are many other Jewish fashion designers but I won't go into detail about each one of them because the aforementioned cases already explain my point about the Jewish influence in Western fashion.

Jewish fashion founders/designers:

• Doris F. Fisher (Gap)

• Michael Kors

• Sara Blakely (Spanx)

• Levi Strauss

• Paul Marciano (Guess)

• Nathan Swartz (Timberland)

• Marc Jacobs

• Donna Karan (DKNY

• Dov Charney (American Apparel)

• Calvin Klein

The list goes on and on but you get the picture. Western fashion is dominated by Jews. The modern styles you're familiar with are tremendously influenced by Jewish designers. Some styles are good but the general result has been disastrous.

The immoral changes have come about gradually. But in some cases abruptly to desensitize the public. Like Bella Hadid does in the image above. Pelvic cutouts are a novel way to arouse sexual desire and attention. There's nothing aesthetically pleasing about exposing this area but it's close enough to the genitals to arouse the passions. Much like 100% plastic yoga pants. It allows a woman to parade naked without being naked. The constant need for erotica mainly drives female fashion.

Ethnic clothing to improve culture.

Can a piece of fabric bring back traditional times? Not on its own but it definitely helps. As I said earlier, clothing is your personal flag. You literally carry it with you. Whether you're conscious of it or not, sends a signal to friends and strangers. What you wear has an incredible effect on your psychology. It also brings like-minded people together.

What you believe should reflect your style. This is why you can't take Christians seriously who dress immodestly. Or Muslim women without a hijab. In any case, you should always opt for God-given natural materials such as linen, wool, cotton, and silk.

As stated earlier, look into heritage brands such as Harris Tweed. Google for similar brands. I do not suggest larping as Peaky Blinders actors. It should be a mix of the old and modern. The point is that virtuous citizens are highly conscientious of what they wear, not to gain empty flattery but out of self-respect and ideology.

Dressing conservatively is patriotic and moral

Subscribe now

Inferiority complex is a problem within Islamic circles. Do a Google search about it and there are countless articles and forum threads. Instead of not trying to seek external validation, they blame post-colonialism for feeling insecure about Islam. The Muslim and liberal share commonalities on this front because it scapegoats the white man.

‘‘Unfortunately, this is the mentality of some Muslims today. It’s a defeatist mentality, a remnant of the effects of colonialism, and the inferiority complex some Muslims have.’’ - Muslim Skeptic

‘‘Post-colonialism seeded the idea that our Western counterparts are somehow better. Although this may not be a conscious thought, it can manifest in our thinking and action in many ways. We can look at the lives and success of our Western peers and so easily be drawn into the fantasy that they have the upper edge in this Dunya. Sadly, left unattended this feeling can develop into an inferiority complex not just on an individual level, but an Ummah level as well.’’ - Productive Muslim

Islamic culture is awkwardly stuck between Western superiority and Far-East Asian economic progress. Westerners conquered the world, and invented infrastructure as you know it, virtually all media platforms and entertainment. The Chinese, South Koreans, and especially the Japanese produce electronics we use every day. Asian and Western influences permeate the globe, and the Middle East is no different.

Understanding Islam's place.

But all these influences that improve the comfort of the Muslims come from infidels while nothing of substantial value comes from Islam. Certainly not an invention the world depends on like the internet or running water. The Islamic world is still hung up on the Golden Age of Islam. A supposed era of marvelous scientific discoveries by Muslim scholars. A time of Arabic superiority over Byzantine and Persian barbarity. This fabricated ''Golden Age'' has been pushed since the Enlightenment as an attack on the Catholic church. Liberal academics and media still push this narrative to paint Christian culture as backward. Namely by defaming the Crusaders as a means to astroturf Islam while erasing the fundamental identity of Europeans.

In reality, there was an age of great learning during the rapid Muslim conquest after Muhammad's death in the 7th century. But scholarship wasn't by Muslims. Most, if not all of the administrative, scientific, and cultural progress was thanks to dhimmis. Second-class citizens who were Jews, Christians, or Persians. They operated under Arabic names which is misleading and an error of historians to categorize them as Muslims.

The Islamic Golden Age lasted from the 8th to the 14th century which is in parallel with the greatest conquest of Islam. The Ottoman Empire was the last great spurt of Islam which died after WWI. Even the Turks relied much on Orthodox Christians and captured Europeans to occupy high ranks in administration or the military.

The Ottoman Empire died in 1922 and with it true Islamic power. The Turks were the last Muslims who could fully enforce Sharia law and realistically annex non-Christian nations. For 101 years that hasn't happened again. This is devasting to Islam because jihad is core theology. Imagine Orthodox Christianity without a clergy. The religion would cease to exist which is technically the case with Islam.

Internet-induced embarrassment.

During the 14 centuries of Islamic warmongering, nothing notable came out of the Middle East, culture or science-wise. These last 30 decades (thanks to the internet) made that fact glaringly obvious. Before then, the general public had no idea what Muhammad taught. What the Sunnah or Quran are. It simply wasn't relevant because Europe never had to suffer mass migration of Muslims. The daily conflict between Muslims and Europeans forces non-Muslims to find out exactly why these Muhammadans behave so backward in modern times.

The Quran is Allah's perfect word. Exemplified in the life of Muhammad, the role model for every Muslim is the key source to understanding Islam. The Hadiths are very detailed about his life. From consummating marriage with a 9-year-old girl to praying in semen-stained clothing. Violent passages about Jews, Christians, and other infidels explain why Muslims are overrepresented in criminal statistics despite making up approximately 5% of the Dutch population. Rape, theft, robbery, and harassment are vastly perpetuated by Muslims because its core to their beliefs: Islam.

The average Joe doesn't need to read up on history to learn about Arabic culture because he is experiencing the fruits of their barbarism. Those poor European schmucks are well aware of violent tendencies from Morrocan and Turkish youth. No one is buying the media's positive portrayal of Muslims anymore because of personal experience and basic knowledge of Islam.

Muslim inferiority complex.

Imagine you're a 30-year-old Afghani Muslim refugee. You have lived your entire life in the city of Kandahar. The only contact with Western civilization you had was through the television and maybe a pair of Levi's jeans. You're completely oblivious to higher culture such as classical music, poetry, and state-of-the-art infrastructure. Not to mention, the superior architecture and general higher IQ people. The hypothetical Afghani is totally culture-shocked after disembarking from his Jewish NGO-funded boat. He is programmed to believe that Islam is superior to any culture. This belief comes from the doctrine that Muhammad is the last prophet. He left a literal A to Z tutorial for life behind. But the Afghani cannot deny what his senses transmit to his brain. He can see, feel, and hear that the West is superior in every way to Islam.

''The West is the best.'' Deep down, the Muslim is well aware of this undeniable fact. The few that do admit that are usually well on their way to apostatize. The majority that's in deniable live a life that's incomparably better to Middle Eastern standards. But that's no thanks to Islam. Reconciling their faith with Western living standards is impossible which manifests an inferiority complex. They enjoy soccer, video games, pop music, movies, and alcohol which is all Western entertainment. Yet they're incredibly zealous for Islam. It's like that one tiny trinket they've been desperately holding on to that forms their fragile identity which they cannot wait to show their idols.

In other words, Muslims have nothing to show for in the West except for Islam which is why they obsess over 'white' people converting to their Arabic faith. What joy they displayed when Andrew Tate converted to Islam! An outsider who happened to be Anglo-American accepted 'their thing'. Especially Western-Muslims suffer from the need for validation. The need substantiates the title of this article.

What's interesting to note is that a new Western convert is always pedestalized. As if our Arab friends unconsciously concede the need for a leader outside their tribe. Especially a native Westerner. This bizarre behavior is truly a sign that Islam is dying, in need of validation from the dominating culture.

The Iranian dilemma.

To be a contemporary Muslim is synonymous with bipolarity because trying to reconcile a barbaric religion with Western culture is impossible. The Iranians are a great example. Iran produces many brilliant scientists despite centuries of Islamic oppression. The Persians always had a knack for astronomy, mathematics, etc.

Iranian scientists discovered that science contradicts the Quran's teachings. Consequently, they do not know what to do with that information because apostasy is undesirable in a state that's Sharia-compliant. When they leave Iran and remain Muslim, they're unable to preach confidently about their theological convictions due to the contradictions between their faith and profession.

The only reason they cling to Islam is nostalgia. It's their childhood, family, and identity. In one of those rare cases where a 'white' does convert to Islam is surely a moment to be celebrated because it affirms their nostalgia from a 'superior' source. This is the case with every Muslim, not just Iranians.

Rebellion against Logos.

Muslims have a culture of recitation. Memorizing the Quran is a show of great piety instead of believing with the heart as Christians do. It's a religion of works. If your good deeds outweigh the bad you'll be accepted into Paradise. Recitation helps with their iman (strength of faith), especially against rational external critique. This is how most Muslims deal with the desires of apostasy.

Not to mention, deceiving themselves into thinking they're the last religion. Of what exactly? Satanism? Nowhere in the Islamic sources can they prove continuity with the Old Testament. In f

act, the Quran confirms the Bible. None of these facts register in the mind of the Muslim because he is rebelling against rationality, against Jesus Christ, the Word of God. Their inferiority complex implies that Islam is not in touch with God's reality. Meaning, as touched on earlier, incompatible with nature, science, technological progress, or any transcendental. If it did, their conscience wouldn't bother them in the form of said complex.

The Apostolic Catholic Orthodox Church never had this problem because it could reconcile with philosophy and science. Better yet, Hebrew history and transcendentals complement each other.",

Subscribe now